Your membership has expired

The payment for your account couldn't be processed or you've canceled your account with us.

Re-activate

Save products you love, products you own and much more!

Save products icon

Other Membership Benefits:

Savings icon Exclusive Deals for Members Best time to buy icon Best Time to Buy Products Recall tracker icon Recall & Safety Alerts TV screen optimizer icon TV Screen Optimizer and more

    FDA Bans Red Dye No. 3 From Food

    Food safety experts and advocates applaud the move while urging additional progress

    A large white "X" shape, a dropper releasing red liquid into a small bottle below, surrounded by colorful, reflective round confetti-like shapes on a pink background. Photo Illustration: Chris Griggs/Consumer Reports, Getty Images

    In a decision long anticipated by food safety experts, the Food and Drug Administration announced today that it is banning Red Dye No. 3 from food. 

    The FDA has been aware for years that this petroleum-based artificial colorant has been shown to cause cancer in animals. Several studies have also linked ingestion of Red Dye No. 3, also known as erythrosine, to hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral effects in children.

    The FDA had already banned the use of Red Dye No. 3 in cosmetics in 1990 after evidence began to mount about its potential harms. But, for complicated bureaucratic reasons, the dye was still allowed in food, and the food industry continued to say it was safe to consume. Over the years, Red Dye No. 3 has been used to brighten the reds and pinks of thousands of foods, including candy, baked goods, fruit juice, fruit cocktail, strawberry milk, hot dogs, fake bacon, and more. A database maintained by the Environmental Working Group currently identifies it among the ingredients of more than 3,000 products.

    Urge the FDA to Get Other Toxic Dyes Out of Food

    Sign’s CR’s petition today.

    More on Red Dye No. 3

    Food safety experts have expressed concern that so many of the products containing the dye are marketed to children, who are especially vulnerable to developmental harm. The FDA estimates that children ages 2 to 5 in the U.S. consume twice as much Red Dye No. 3 as the rest of the American public, by body weight.

    In 2022, Consumer Reports joined a petition to the FDA calling for the agency to ban Red Dye No. 3. Then in October 2024, CR delivered another petition to the FDA, signed by 80,000 concerned consumers, urging the same.

    Meanwhile, local regulators took action: In 2023, California banned Red Dye No. 3 from all food sold or manufactured in the state, and more states may follow

    Food manufacturers will have until Jan. 15, 2027, to reformulate their products.

    For CR’s food safety experts, the FDA’s move is better late than never. “By banning Red Dye No. 3, the FDA will protect the public by encouraging manufacturers to switch to safer ingredients already used in products sold in Europe and numerous other countries,” says Brian Ronholm, director of food policy at Consumer Reports. “Red Dye No. 3 poses an unacceptable risk to our health, especially when safer alternatives are readily available.”

    Ronholm adds that the FDA still needs to do more. Many other common artificial ingredients have also been linked to health harms. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment released a study in 2021 linking several other artificial food colorants to potential neurobehavioral effects in children (PDF). These include Red Dye No. 40, Yellow Dye No. 5, Yellow Dye No. 6, Blue Dye No. 1, Blue Dye No. 2, and Green Dye No. 3.


    Lauren Kirchner

    Lauren Kirchner is an investigative reporter on the special projects team at Consumer Reports. She has been with CR since 2022, covering product safety. She has previously reported on algorithmic bias, criminal justice, and housing for the Markup and ProPublica, and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in Explanatory Reporting in 2017. Send her tips at [email protected] and follow her on X: @lkirchner.