Your membership has expired

The payment for your account couldn't be processed or you've canceled your account with us.

Re-activate

Save products you love, products you own and much more!

Save products icon

Other Membership Benefits:

Savings icon Exclusive Deals for Members Best time to buy icon Best Time to Buy Products Recall tracker icon Recall & Safety Alerts TV screen optimizer icon TV Screen Optimizer and more

    First Drive: 2024 Acura ZDX Is Almost a Really Good GM SUV

    This upscale EV takes some of the good, less of the bad from its Ultium-platform siblings, the Chevrolet Blazer EV and Honda Prologue

    Update: Since this first drive was originally published in August, 2024, we finished testing the Acura ZDX. Read the complete Acura ZDX road test.

    Following on the heels of the Prologue electric vehicle, Honda’s luxury division rolled out its own version, the 2024 Acura ZDX. Like the mainstream Honda SUV, the ZDX is the second model born from the short-lived Honda-General Motors partnership that allows Honda/Acura to make use of GM’s Ultium batteries and electric vehicle architecture in designing and building its own EVs.

    GM builds a number of models on this new platform, including the Cadillac Lyriq and Chevrolet Blazer EV, which are similar to the ZDX and Prologue, along with the GMC Hummer EV and Chevrolet Equinox EV. Honda says it has plans to develop EVs on its own in the future.

    In this article Arrow link

    At first glance, the ZDX and Prologue look quite different—they each have distinctive external styling, such as the treatments for the grille, tailgate, and rear side window. But climb inside and there is little that differentiates the two SUVs. 

    More On Electric Vehicles

    Interestingly, the two SUVs have slightly different dimensions. The ZDX is 6 inches longer than the Prologue (198 vs. 192), but the wheelbase is the same, so that extra length hasn’t resulted in a roomier interior. Going by our measurements, the ZDX is heavier, with the all-wheel-drive A-Spec coming in at 5,790 pounds while the Prologue Touring AWD tips the scales at 5,210 pounds. A portion of the ZDX’s weight comes from its larger battery (for comparison that is nearly 1,300 pounds more than our AWD, three-row MDX). The ZDX has a higher tow rating, at 3,500 pounds, compared with the Prologue’s 1,500-pound rating. 

    The ZDX qualifies for the full $7,500 Federal EV tax incentive because it’s built in Spring Hill, Tenn., at a GM factory, where it is assembled alongside the Lyriq. The Prologue and Blazer EV are manufactured in Mexico. (Find out what electric vehicle tax incentives you may qualify for.)

    Pricing begins at $64,500 for the base A-Spec trim with rear-wheel drive, while the AWD A-Spec we bought for our test program starts at $68,500. The AWD-only Type S starts at $73,500, and the AWD Type S with the performance wheel and tire package is $1,000 more. Acura charges a $1,350 destination fee on the ZDX.

    If you’re a Consumer Reports member, our initial expert assessment of the 2024 Acura ZDX is available to you below. We since completed 2,000 break-in miles and put the ZDX through more than 50 tests at the CR Auto Test Center, including empirical tests of acceleration, braking, handling, and usability. CR members now have access to the full road test results.

    What we bought: 2024 Acura ZDX A-Spec AWD
    Powertrain: 490-hp, dual electric motors; 102-kWh battery; 1-speed direct drive; all-wheel drive 
    MSRP: $68,500
    Options: Blue Abyss paint, $600 
    Destination fee: $1,350
    Total cost: $70,450 (before the available $7,500 federal tax incentive)

    CR's Take

    The ZDX may be the “it’s just right” of the four Ultium EVs we are testing, though it still doesn’t elicit much excitement. As one tester said, “GM loaded the deck with the Cadillac Lyriq and left the scraps for the others to fight over.”

    So while it may not match up to the Lyriq’s blend of power, handling, steering feel, and interior richness, the ZDX is a better vehicle than the Chevrolet Blazer EV and Honda Prologue. 

    Yet for those who appreciate Acura’s history of taking a sportier approach to luxury, the ZDX doesn’t exude any “Acura-ness” at all. The ZDX feels heavy and not particularly exciting to drive. Despite having 490 hp on tap, most drivers felt it was slow off the line.

    The interior is not on a par with other Acura vehicles, nor does it feel special enough to justify a $70,000 price tag. An AWD Lyriq Luxury 2 trim costs $70,000 as well. The Lyriq not only has a nicer interior but also includes three years of GM’s Super Cruise hands-free active driving assistance system. That feature, called Hands Free Cruise, is available only on the ZDX Type S.

    It’s not all bad, though. The prodigious powertrain gives the ZDX some zip after some initial sluggishness. Most drivers are big fans of the seats, which are the most supportive and comfortable of the four Ultium models. Like the Prologue, the ZDX’s infotainment system is much easier to use than the GM vehicles’, plus it comes with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay capability. Heck, the seat adjustments are even easy to use . . . we’re looking at you, Cadillac.

    In our First Drive of the Prologue we said it could disappoint brand loyalists who are used to a certain quality for interior materials, but the simplified user experience and “just enough” Honda cues may attract buyers. The ZDX is much the same, only with a thin luxury veneer and some more power.

    What We Like

    Ride comfort: It’s unique to have four vehicles in our fleet from different brands that are built on the same platform. But each uses different wheel and tire sizes and different suspension tuning. As such, a pecking order on ride quality has developed. After nearly 1,500 miles, the ZDX sits firmly in second place (behind the Lyriq but ahead of the Prologue and Blazer). It does a good job absorbing most bumps, and the body doesn’t wallow or bounce up and down. It feels firm, but there’s no chassis shake and there aren’t any harsh hits transmitted to the passengers. The only types of impacts that punch through are those encountered when driving at speed over uneven expansion joints, such as on a bridge, and other common road seams. 

    One-pedal performer: Acura did a very good job tuning the accelerator’s response when in “one-pedal driving” mode. One tester said it is far smoother than the other three Ultium models and could be the best of all EVs in which they’ve used one-pedal mode. They had no problems with how the ZDX decelerated when lifting off the accelerator pedal nor were there any unsmooth transitions from regenerative braking to friction braking.

    2024 Acura ZDX charging
    We are happy that the 2024 Acura ZDX features a manually operated charge port door.

    Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports

    No gimmicks needed: Acura avoided the all-too-common “gimmick creep” found in luxury models, where all kinds of unique and useless features get added in as if they somehow justify the higher price. For instance, we appreciate that the ZDX has a manual charge port door instead of the power ones found on the GM versions. There are far fewer finicky controls, especially when compared with the Lyriq. And we’re down on our knees in praise that the ZDX has traditional door handles instead of motorized ones that retract and pop out, then require you to contort your hand to use them.  

    Even the fake motor noises that accompany acceleration aren’t overly intrusive or weird, like with many EVs. There’s a light background noise that’s evident only when accelerating hard. It gives you back some of the sensation that’s missing with the lack of an internal combustion engine.

    EV capabilities: The big 102-kilowatt-hour battery gives the all-wheel-drive ZDX an EPA-estimated range of 304 miles (313 for RWD), which is competitive for the segment. Now, big batteries like this take longer to charge, and the standard 11.5-kW onboard charger is typical among EVs. Unfortunately, the 19.2-kW version that is optional on the Lyriq isn’t available on the ZDX. However, the ZDX’s 190-kW maximum acceptance rate at public DC fast charging locations is competitive. According to Acura, all ZDXs can go from a 20 percent state-of-charge (SOC) to an 80 percent SOC in 42 minutes on a DC fast charger.

    Infotainment/User Interface (UI): As we noted with the Prologue, the ZDX uses the GM software platform as the basis for the infotainment system and UI, but the Acura has its own version. This system is much easier to use than the GM systems, with smaller yet easier-to-read icons and graphics. Plus, the ZDX gets Android Auto and Apple CarPlay capability; GM isn’t equipping its EVs with either feature (although our early build Lyriq has both, oddly). Combined with the pared-down interface, it makes for a better experience.

    What We Don't Like

    Steering and handling fall short: There’s a distinct lack of agility when hustling the ZDX around. Some of that comes from the slow steering, which takes 3.5 rotations to go from lock to lock. This means the driver has to do a lot of twirling of the steering wheel to get the ZDX to turn, particularly at low to moderate speeds. 

    Like the other Ultium models, the ZDX is wide and very heavy, and it makes its bulk known very early into a turn as well as when transitioning out of one. In addition, there’s little steering feedback, so the driver doesn’t get a good indication of how much grip the front tires have. One tester said that it feels as if the ZDX has the least front-end bite of all the Ultiums. The end result is that the ZDX isn’t particularly engaging to drive quickly when the road is twisty.  

    2024 Acura ZDX steering wheel
    The steering wheel, climate controls, and most of the other switchgear in the 2024 Acura ZDX are all sourced from General Motors.

    Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports

    Luxury price, nonluxury feel: We called the Prologue’s interior “sorta okay,” but that’s because it’s only a $56,000 model. At $70,000, the ZDX’s fit and finish is not impressive, nor is it impressive for Acura in general. There’s padded leather on the door and center armrests, as well as the passenger side of the center console; the dashboard is covered in leather; and there is some nice chromelike trim. But aside from that, the interior has much of the same hard plastic as the Prologue and Blazer EV, and the GM-sourced steering-wheel stalks, control knobs, and switchgear don’t match the quality found in other Acura vehicles.

    It’s hard to make an argument for choosing the ZDX over the Lyriq, given how much nicer the Cadillac is inside. Also, you can get the Lyriq with the same powertrain as the ZDX A-Spec we bought—for $4,000 less. 

    Emergency flashers: It’s frustrating that the emergency flashers button is hidden high up on the overhead console by the SOS and OnStar buttons. Because it’s so small and next to other similar-sized buttons, it’s too easy to hit the wrong button, which could be dire in an emergency unless drivers take their eyes off the road. Yes, it’s a carryover from GM’s typical cluster of buttons, but it really should be located in an easier-to-find location in EVERY one of these EVs.

    Interior button for tailgate: We’re really not sure why the interior button to open/close the rear tailgate has to be so hidden. It’s recessed in the map/storage pocket toward the back of the driver’s door. It’s hard to find at first, and the position makes it awkward to use even when you’re familiar with its location.

    What We'll Keep an Eye On

    Intriguing powertrain: With even more power on tap than our tested Prologue (490 hp vs. 288 hp), the ZDX takes “gentle off the line” to a new extreme. The SUV doesn’t leap off the line so much as it gradually ramps up to 45 mph. At that point, as one tester put it, the ZDX has “plenty of sauce” to accelerate hard. Unless you totally mash the throttle to the floor, it never really feels as if it makes nearly 500 hp.

    Mode and regen settings: The ZDX is alone among its Ultium siblings in having a button on the lower dash to cycle through drive modes. But it sits low on the left side of the dash, somewhat hidden away and awkward to use while driving. 

    Once there you can choose between Sport and Regular modes, but there wasn’t much of a seat-of-the-pants difference; the only thing most people noticed was the elevated computer-generated motor sounds that came with Sport. There’s also no way to coast like in other EVs, where you can just roll along without having the regen system engaged.

    2024 Acura ZDX rear
    The 2024 Acura ZDX is about 6 inches longer than Honda's version of the EV, the Prologue.

    Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports

    It’s frustrating to adjust the regen modes. The driver has to go into the screen and then make a selection before being able to adjust the one-pedal driving levels. On top of that, there is no indication on the system’s status. 

    Like the Prologue, there is a small icon at the top of the infotainment screen that acts as a shortcut to change regen modes. But it has its own confusing logic. If one-pedal driving is turned off, it’s simple: Press the small hole-punch icon and a menu pops up at the same time the system is engaged. Then you can quickly choose between a standard level of braking and a more aggressive one. But if the system is engaged, you either press the icon to turn it off, then turn it on again to access the menu, or you have to go into multiple levels of menus to get to the same screen.

    Seat comfort: Most drivers have found the ZDX’s front seats to be more comfortable and supportive than the Prologue’s. Both the seatback and seat bottom have better contouring, there’s four-way adjustable lumbar support, and the cushions feel softer. Still, some drivers found the bottom cushion too soft but complimented the seatback. One tester said it was as if they were two different seats joined together, adding that they reminded them of the Honda Accord or Acura Integra: fine at first, but after an hour they started shifting around trying to get comfortable.

    Active Safety and Driver Assistance

    Just like the Prologue, the ZDX comes well equipped with a host of active safety and driver assistance features as standard equipment, including automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection, automatic emergency braking that operates at highway speeds, blind spot warning, rear cross traffic warning, reverse automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control. ZDX Type S trims get Hands Free Cruise, which is a rebranding of GM’s Super Cruise, as part of the AcuraWatch 360+ system. 

    So far in our evaluations, the ACC works well. Acceleration and deceleration are smooth, and it’s a comfortable system to use. Unlike the Blazer EV and Lyriq, however, the LDW system doesn’t vibrate the seat, a feedback system that we like because it’s an effective method to alert the driver even when their hands are off the wheel and doesn’t alert the entire cabin. Instead, the ZDX uses audible alerts to warn the driver.

    The LKA system tends to activate a bit late after the ZDX has already left the lane, but it’s consistently able to push the vehicle back into the lane even around sharper curves. So the system can be relied upon to push the vehicle back into the lane but not to keep it in the lane. This is different from what we experienced in the Blazer EV, where LKA activated a bit earlier to prevent the vehicle from departing the lane along straight roads. 

    The BSW system uses amber lights that flash in the side mirrors, but it lacks audible warnings.

    Finally, the ZDX A-Spec lacks lane centering assistance (LCA), which is a feature that has been standard on Acuras for a few years. This could feel like a downgrade to any current Acura owner who buys a ZDX.


    Jon Linkov

    Jon Linkov is the deputy auto editor at Consumer Reports. He has been with CR since 2002, covering varied automotive topics including buying and leasing, maintenance and repair, ownership, reliability, used cars, and electric vehicles. He manages CR’s lineup of special interest publications, hosts CR’s “Talking Cars” podcast, and writes and edits content for CR’s online and print products. An avid cyclist, Jon also enjoys driving his ’80s-era sports car and instructing at track days.